Discussion:
3.5.9 for F7/F8?
Neal Becker
2008-02-19 17:47:57 UTC
Permalink
Looks like 3.5.9 has some good updates for kdepim.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
Rex Dieter
2008-02-19 17:51:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Neal Becker
Looks like 3.5.9 has some good updates for kdepim.
They're queued for release, pending fedora's releng folks to push the
next round of updates to mirrors.

-- Rex

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
dexter
2008-02-19 18:25:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rex Dieter
Post by Neal Becker
Looks like 3.5.9 has some good updates for kdepim.
They're queued for release, pending fedora's releng folks to push the
next round of updates to mirrors.
I've snagged unsigned 3.5.9 from koji built on the 16th: the releng bottle
neck is to painfull.

...dex


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
José Matos
2008-02-21 10:20:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rex Dieter
Post by Neal Becker
Looks like 3.5.9 has some good updates for kdepim.
They're queued for release, pending fedora's releng folks to push the
next round of updates to mirrors.
-- Rex
After updating from testing-updates there are some snags from unsolved
dependencies. Would it be possible to update the corresponding packages in
unstable? :-)

# yum update
Loading "skip-broken" plugin
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package kdewebdev-libs.i386 6:3.5.9-1.fc8 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: kdelibs3 >= 3.5.9 for package: kdewebdev-libs
---> Package kdevelop-libs.i386 9:3.5.1-1.fc8 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: kdevelop = 9:3.5.1-1.fc8 for package: kdevelop-libs
---> Package kdepim-libs.i386 6:3.5.9-5.fc8 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: kdepim = 6:3.5.9-5.fc8 for package: kdepim-libs
--> Processing Dependency: kdelibs3 >= 3.5.9 for package: kdepim-libs
---> Package kdepim-devel.i386 6:3.5.9-5.fc8 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
---> Package kdewebdev-libs.i386 6:3.5.9-1.fc8 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: kdelibs3 >= 3.5.9 for package: kdewebdev-libs
---> Package kdevelop.i386 9:3.5.1-1.fc8 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libcvsservice.so.0 for package: kdevelop
---> Package kdepim-libs.i386 6:3.5.9-5.fc8 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: kdelibs3 >= 3.5.9 for package: kdepim-libs
---> Package kdepim.i386 6:3.5.9-5.fc8 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: kdelibs3 >= 3.5.9 is needed by package
kdewebdev-libs
Error: Missing Dependency: kdelibs3 >= 3.5.9 is needed by package kdepim-libs
Error: Missing Dependency: libcvsservice.so.0 is needed by package kdevelop

So I guess all comes down to kdelibs3... that we don't get from
testing-updates because it is kdelibs and the installed 4.0.1 supersedes it.
--
José Abílio

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
Thomas Moschny
2008-03-01 08:51:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rex Dieter
Post by Neal Becker
Looks like 3.5.9 has some good updates for kdepim.
They're queued for release, pending fedora's releng folks to push the
next round of updates to mirrors.
Using kdepim-3.5.9-5.fc8.i386, the contact manager does seem to have a
character encoding problem for contacts stored in an imap folder (via kmail).
All non-ascii chars (in all fields) are garbled. Does anyone else see this?
Contacts stored in a local address book are not affected.

- Thomas

Loading...